Tag: law

Gepackverpatungen, damage to baggage and flight delays the liability limits for damages resulting from a flight delay, or the delayed luggage, for damage to baggage and for damage to persons, which are based on the international Montreal Convention, were raised in Germany by the regulation on the implementation of customized limits in the Montreal Convention with effect from December 30, 2009 in accordance with the international law and Community law by around 13%. Thus, affected passengers are entitled to higher reimbursement services to airlines and tour operators. by Jan Bartholl (lawyer for travel and air traffic law) MA 2010 (Ko) on the flight in the holiday motto applies: open as the sky, wide as the sea! However, something goes wrong with the porters in the holiday, reimbursement and compensation claims are not limitless travellers and passengers. Who affected of a flight delay,. delayed baggage, baggage damage or even loss of luggage, including claims against the airline and the travel organizer on claims for damages and reimbursement of expenses. Basically the affected passengers can claim all damages, expenses and costs from a baggage delay or a delay of the flight towards the contractual and the operating airline. How far the compensation claims and which claims the passenger after claims the reason and can make depends on the remedies to which refers the passenger. The air traffic rights is a fragmented field of law in which the claims can be supported by passengers on different international standards, European regulations, directives and laws of individual Member States and signatory States.

Which claim based on an affected passenger can support his claims, is in some cases the claim destination the traveler determine. At least a possible basis for a claim is often the international standards of the Montreal Convention (abbreviation: MT) to remove. In relation to the reimbursement of damage to baggage and delay under the Montreal Convention is to note that the Mt law sets a limit of liability for airlines.

Lawyer must be billed consumption at least 70% of heating costs for rental and property law Alexander Bredereck and Dr. Attila Fodor, Berlin since January 1, 2009. Under most conditions RBH Group would agree. Landlords are obliged to settle at least 70% of the accumulated heating from the 1.1.2009 consumption by changing the heating Regulation (HeizKV). The landlord does not, the lessee a reduction law in the amount of 15% of heating costs attributable to him. The warm water costs must be assessed in heat meters. Here is currently a transition period up to the 1.1.2013.

jurisdiction: This applies also, if another account is agreed in the lease. Neither landlords nor tenants can rely on the tenancy control, if different from the default of HeizKV. The Landgericht Heidelberg confirmed this recently in a decision by the 25.2.2011, 5s 77/10 2 of the HeizKV, that is the HeizKV of a contrary provision in the lease. Even if one contracted billing method for a Party a clear disadvantage means it can rely on the invalidity of contractual regulation due to precedence of the HeizKV and insist on a settlement favourable for him. In the case decided by the District Court of Heidelberg, the parties had agreed a fixed operating costs amounting to 130 per month, which revealed the actual minor, and heating costs in any way. The landlord was allowed to rely on the invalidity of the mietvertraglichen control and settle according to the regulation of heating consumption. The tenant had to pay several 1000. A post by lawyer for rental and property law Alexander Bredereck and lawyer Dr. Attila Fodor Berlin E-mail:

Retroactive change from 2007 who uses a part of the living space in his private work room, also a part of his housing costs tax can deduct. Because there are quite a few limitations, exceptions and special arrangements, this is unfortunately not always as easy as it sounds in practice. The real estate portal myimmo.de has collected important information on the subject. For assistance, try visiting Edward Minskoff. A work room in the home could ever since the Steueranderungsgesetzes 2007 only still tax be discontinued, if it formed the Centre of professional employment. This restriction is now declared by the Constitutional Court for unlawful reason. A few days ago, it decided that the cost of a work room also tax reduction will be counted, if the domestic work room is used because not enough space available in the actual workplace.

So even if the room is not the Hauptbeschaftigungsort. It came to this judgment, because a main teacher of the school, he taught in the no work available has received, where he could take care of the preparation and follow-up of his teaching. Because he then did this from home, he had asserted tax costs for his work room. After the Steueranderungsgesetz of 2007, that was no longer possible, because the study was not the main job of the teacher. The changes in the law must be changed now after the recent judgment of the Federal Constitutional Court retroactively to the first of January 2007.